review manager version 5 1 7 for windows (STATA Corporation)
STATA Corporation is a verified supplier 
99
Structured Review
STATA Corporation
review manager version 5 1 7 for windows
Review Manager Version 5 1 7 For Windows, supplied by STATA Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 28089 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/review+manager+version+5+1+7+for+windows/STATA+11%2E0/pm28820034-31-41-55
Average 99 stars, based on 28089 article reviews
Review Manager Version 5 1 7 For Windows, supplied by STATA Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 28089 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/review+manager+version+5+1+7+for+windows/STATA+11%2E0/pm28820034-31-41-55
Average 99 stars, based on 28089 article reviews
review manager version 5 1 7 for windows - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
99/100 stars
Images
Related Articles
Software:Article Title: The role of minimal access valve surgery in the elderly. A meta-analysis of observational studies. Article Snippet: .. Analysis was conducted by use of Review Manager® Version 5.1.7 for Windows (The Cochrane Collaboration, Software Update, Oxford, UK) and Article Title: What Is the Role of Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery in High-Risk Patients? A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Article Snippet: .. Analysis was conducted by use of Article Title: Meta analysis of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic fundoplication in children. Article Snippet: ⁎ Corresponding author at: The Hamlyn Centre, Institu Imperial College London, 3rd floor Paterson Building, S 1PF, United Kingdom.. Tel.. : +44 20 3312 5140. Article Title: The value of adding sub-valvular procedures for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation surgery: a meta-analysis. Article Snippet: .. Meta-analysis was performed in line with recommendations from the Cochrane Collaboration and in accordance with both PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and MOOSE (Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines.5,6 The analysis was conducted by use of Review Manager Version 5.1.7 for Windows (The Cochrane Collaboration, Software Update, Oxford, UK) and Article Title: Meta-analysis of robot-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in children. Article Snippet: Patients and Methods Studies published up to December 2013 were identified from multiple literature databases.. Only comparative studies investigating RAP vs LP or OP in children were included.. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects modelling. |